Its hard to write a paragraph that defines who you are.
Who am I? Do we define ourselves? Or do others define us? Or do our actions define us? Identity is challenging. Am I defined by my journey as a Trial Lawyer who wages epic battles with evil corporations and insurance companies? Am I defined by my 7 and 8 figure verdicts? Am I defined by the confidential settlements I can't talk about? Or am I defined by the $50,000 settlements that change my client's lives? Money is not success. But money is success. Am I defined by my childhood? Growing up in South Florida, always wanting to be an actor, a trial lawyer, or a president of something? Does serving as high school student body president make a doosh? I failed (quit) my movie star pursuit in Hollywood, does that boost my cred or detract from it? Am I defined by family?
My three young boys (1,4,6) mean more to me than any case and I would quit practicing law tomorrow if it was somehow necessary to help my kids. There isn't much I wouldn't do for them. I wish I had more hours in the day to spend with them. And yet, when I look at them, I think of my toxic tort client who was diagnosed with Leukemia at 18, has lost one leg and likely another because of a company's toxic emissions, and I imagine if this happened to one of my children. Or am I defined by my pursuit of Karate and mastery of the bow and spear so that one day I may fight like the Viper of Dorne? I want to be the Champion of those who cannot fight for themselves. Who is John Galt?
Most lawyers are boring and bore jurors into not caring. Or worse, they try too hard to entertain them and make the jurors hate them. We need to find a happy medium – keeping the jurors entertained and caring about your case, without pushing them away by acting over the top. I trained as a stage actor throughout college and moved to LA upon graduation to purse acting before going back to law school. I have found that learning how to emote and act brings clarity, passion, emotion to your presentations.Most jurors exposure to lawyers involves watching lawyers on TV. So we need to give them what they want.
I will teach and model how to pick your moments to use dramatic techniques throughout trial to keep them entertained and trusting you.You will not be "acting" in the courtroom, you will be living your true self and expressing your full range of authentic emotions and maximizing your presentation skills with an eye towards your listener/watcher. This will run the full gamut of trial – from Voir Dire, to Opening, Witnesses direct and cross, and Closing.These techniques include speaking directly to your client, using pauses, incorporating defense counsel into the story theatrically, and story telling with emotion and intention.Its gonna be a hoot.
A live and interactive Voir Dire Session.
Kurt will question 10 jurors and work through all of the challenging concepts that mirror his Voir Dire in 30 minutes or less presentation, as well as topics when you have more time. After demonstrating during the live session, Kurt will explain and walk through the strategies on how to get jurors to talk and share honestly, how to deal with difficult jurors and questions, how to use topics to both plant seeds and discover toxic jurors, and how to elicit the right testimony to strike jurors for cause.
Steve Straughen was a well site supervisor at an oil and gas frack site. All of the oil extracted from the ground was being deposited in large frac tanks - rectangular tanks about the size and shape of a mobile home. While investigating strange sounds from the top of the tank, the tank exploded sending Steve 50 feet into the air. Steve survived with severe orthopedic injuries, but ultimately lost his leg. The tanks exploded because they were poorly maintained and delivered to the site with holes in them. https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/oil-gas-worker-injured-frac-tank-explosion-awarded-30-million-colorado-federal-court/
Kurt will Voir Dire on the following issues:
Too often we don't have enough time for Voir Dire. When you have only 30 minutes or less, learn how to hit all the big topics (tort reform, burden of proof, money for pain and large damages) while both planting seeds for trial and discovering toxic jurors you need to strike.
30b6/PMKs
Fact witnesses
Order of depositions
Your client’s deposition
5. Trial Preparation
6. Jury Selection in Premises Cases
7. Opening
8. Cross of Defense Witnesses
9. Closing and Rebuttal
Lawyers hate legal writing. And for good reason - its terribly boring. So stop writing like a lawyer and tell a damn story. This CLE will teach how to write in a way that moves the reader to want to rule in your favor. You can use this technique in every brief you write (from discovery disputes to substantive motions) maximizing the chances you will be able to introduce the evidence you need at trial. Without winning the briefing, you may never be able to present the case you want at trial. I learned this after working a federal law clerk for a year right after law school and literally falling asleep at my desk, only to wake up and see the Judge staring at me.
As exemplars, I will use two cases in which a winning brief on spoliation and a winning punitive damage brief led to two eight figure verdicts in CRPS electrocution cases I tried with Sarah McEahern; both had past meds under 300K. I will break down the cases and the briefs and show you how to use the writing techniques I have developed over the years and what they look like in action. I will also show how the evidence I developed in the wining briefs was dramatically introduced at trial. The presentation, like my writing, will entertain you like Maximus in Africa. If you like Lord of the Rings and Game of Thrones, you will be even more entertained.
Breakfast
7:30am - 9:30am
Hosted by

Blair Warner · Chin Pandya Beer or Wine? Impact of PE on the Legal IndustryCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Kurt ZanerVoir Dire in 30 Minutes or LessCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by

Ted Wacker · Doug Wacker Gig Delivery Companies – What They Aren’t Doing: Background Checks & Permits After Proposition 22Lunch
Sponsored by

Dan Ambrose · Przemek Lubecki Rapport Voir Dire, The First 5 MinutesCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Jason WaechterMotorcycles 101: Handling Your First Motorcycle Injury Case with ConfidenceCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Jerry BowmanBefore the Evidence Dies: the First 30 Days of PI Investigation Breakfast
7:30am - 9:30am
Hosted by
George MoschopoulosAsking for Real Money in Employment Cases: Putting a Number on DignityCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Brian PanishMaximizing the Value of AmputationsCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Corey SudaHandling and Trying Your First Trucking CaseLunch
Sponsored by

Al Foeckler · Dan Ambrose Black Hat Justice Witness Preparation and Direct Examination LectureCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Kimball Jones9-Figure Framing: Creativity on Every CrossCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Dirk DerrickLearning and Leveraging Truth for Your Clients, Your Reputation, and Your Bottom LineBreakfast
7:30am - 9:30am
Hosted by

Sach Oliver · Joe Fried Connecting with Witnesses Thru Uncommon and Crazy TacticsCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by

Jay Vaughn · Ed Ciarimboli Locking in Killer Testimony with Visuals (4 Different Cases)Coffee & Snacks
Hosted by

Robyn Wishart · Phillip Miller “The Art of the Ask: Rhetorical Questions That Frame and Clean Questions That Unlock”Lunch
Sponsored by

Corey Suda · Jay Vaughn Deposition Questions and Demonstratives Proving the Invisible InjuryCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by

Joe Camerlengo · Ed Ciarimboli “Using Your Deposition to Establish Control to Counter the Independent Contractor Defense”Coffee & Snacks
Hosted by

Carl Solomon · Phillip Miller “AI-Driven Prep, Strategy, and Execution – The Next Level of Depositions”Breakfast
7:30am - 9:30am
Hosted by
Dan AmbrosePresentation Skills, Bring Your Case to LifeCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Taylor AsenNegotiating Fast and Slow: Maximizing Case Value Without Leaving Money on the TableCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by

Jennifer Russell · Arya Tahmassebi Same Facts, Different Verdict: The Power of FramingLunch
Sponsored by
Evan OshanHow I Got Past Government Immunity and Obtained a $30.5 Million Verdict with Non-Economic DamagesCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by
Sagi ShakedCommon Excuses/Defenses in Auto casesCoffee & Snacks
Hosted by

Michael Karp · Robert Welcenbach Winning Systems for Trial